Quakefinder Blog

Magnitude 6.0 Napa Earthquake within 25 miles of at least 6 QuakeFinder Research Stations

Work has  begun at QuakeFinder to analyze data from the 6.0 earthquake that occurred at 3:20am local time on August 24 near Napa, California. Our Napa Valley site was the closest, between 9-10 miles away. More soon…

Note of Thanks to Dr. John LaBrecque

As we learn of the retirement of Dr. John LaBrecque, Lead, Earth Surface and Interior Focus Area at NASA Headquarters, we want to extend our warmest thanks and wishes for a relaxing (and exciting) retirement. John has been a major NASA force in supporting, encouraging, advising, critiquing, and funding QuakeFinder over the last 10+ years. When many in the community scoffed at electromagnetic monitoring of earthquake processes, John saw a raw, untapped potential there, and did something about it. For his willingness to listen and to explore with us, and for his general positive attitude and warm, friendly demeanor, we applaud your work and sincerely thank you for your service to the country. The best to you and your family in retirement from Celeste Ford, Tom Bleier and the entire staff at QuakeFinder.

Taiwan: Completing the Network

Several years ago QuakeFinder realized that we just would not get enough earthquakes in California to characterize the electromagnetic signals associated with earthquakes in a reasonable time. We did a study to see which countries had the most earthquakes greater than M5 per year on average. Taiwan was found to have about 15x the number of M5+ quakes than California, so we contacted a colleague (Dr. Tiger Liu) at the National Central University (NCU) in Taiwan. So far, this collaboration has resulted in 5 trips to Taiwan and 15 donated instruments. Together with Dr. Liu and Ian Chen, his assistant, we found good locations mostly along the eastern coastline, close to the subduction fault that borders Taiwan. In May of this year, QuakeFinder technicians Bob and Rey Camins traveled to Taiwan, installed the last 4 instruments, and upgraded the existing 11 instruments to the latest configuration, completing the network. Our colleagues were especially helpful in getting this network installed and running. The installation process involved 12-hour work days, mosquitoes, really large spiders, and occasional snakes. During this trip, heavy rain and landslides were added to the challenges, but the team hung in there and finished the job on time. Many thanks go to the entire team for all their cooperation and hard work.

108 year anniversary of the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake

At 5:12 AM on April 18, 1906, the ground shook like it had never done before in San Francisco. An estimated Magnitude 7.8 earthquake broke the city, and started numerous fires that decimated what was left of many structures. Over 3,000 people died. This major earthquake ruptured 296 miles (477 kilometers) of the San Andreas Fault from San Juan Bautista to Cape Mendocino. No warning was available then. Even today, 108 years later, there is no accepted warning system for such a quake. In 1906, horses were reported to be agitated in the barns near the Presidio prior to the quake. What were they sensing? We think that they may have sensed ultra low frequency magnetic waves or static electricity from ionized air around them. Today we have instrumented much of the San Andreas and other major faults in California with sensitive magnetometers and air ionization sensors to see if these phenomena occur regularly before large quakes. We are actively collecting a valuable “baseline” of electromagnetic signatures for these faults. The hope is that future major quakes repeat the same two week sequence of magnetic pulses and air conductivity changes observed by QuakeFinder instruments that preceded the M5.4 Alum Rock, CA and M6.2 Tacna, Peru quakes in 2007 and 2010 respectively.